For many people, houseplants are part of what makes a house feel like a home. They bring nature indoors, become part of the décor, and sometimes become collections that people have maintained for decades.
But if you are particularly sensitive to mold, there is another side of the houseplant conversation that deserves consideration.
Look beyond the leaves.
Look inside the flowerpot.
The plant itself may not be the primary concern. The greater concern may be the small environment we deliberately create inside the pot to keep that plant alive.
Depending on the plant, that environment can contain moisture, organic material, nutrients, decomposing plant material, moderate temperatures, and an active population of microorganisms. Some potting mixes are specifically designed to retain water. Some homeowners add compost and other organic materials. Some products intentionally introduce beneficial fungi or other microorganisms into the root environment.
For the plant, these conditions can be ideal.
For fungi, some of those same conditions can also be favorable.
And for someone who is particularly sensitive to mold, that raises a reasonable question:
Should the flowerpots inside the home be considered when trying to reduce potential fungal reservoirs?
This Is More Than a Theory
We know that fungi can inhabit potting soil.
In a published hospital study, researchers examined the soil from five potted plants and recovered 16 potentially pathogenic fungal species. Among the organisms identified were Aspergillus fumigatus, Fusarium solani, and other opportunistic fungi. The researchers concluded that indoor plant soils could represent a significant fungal concern for immunosuppressed patients.
Other research examining commercial potting soils, compost, and soil from potted plants has also recovered substantial populations of culturable fungi, including Aspergillus and Penicillium. Some of the species recovered have potential medical importance.
The CDC recognizes this issue as well. Its environmental infection-control guidance states that flowers and potted plants do not need to be restricted around immunocompetent patients. However, it recommends that fresh flowers, dried flowers, and potted plants not be allowed in patient-care areas for immunosuppressed patients because plants and their growing media can act as reservoirs for fungi such as Aspergillus and Fusarium.
That distinction is important.
A mold-sensitive individual is not automatically equivalent to a severely immunocompromised hospital patient. The health risks are different, and we should not pretend otherwise.
But the research establishes the environmental part of the discussion very clearly:
Potting soil can be a fungal reservoir.
The unanswered question for many mold-sensitive individuals is how important that reservoir may be in their particular home.
Why Can a Flowerpot Become a Fungal Reservoir?
Consider what is happening inside an ordinary flowerpot.
The first ingredient is moisture.
Houseplants must be watered, and many popular indoor plants prefer growing media that remain moist for extended periods. Water may also remain at the bottom of a container, collect in a saucer, or become trapped inside a decorative outer pot where it cannot easily evaporate.
The second ingredient is organic material.
Commercial potting media commonly contain materials such as peat moss, bark, coconut coir, compost, and other plant-derived materials. Agricultural extension guidance identifies peat moss, bark, coir, compost, and similar materials as common organic components of container-growing media.
Unlike inorganic components such as perlite or sand, organic components eventually decompose.
Then there are the roots themselves, fallen leaves, plant debris, and other material that may accumulate on or beneath the surface.
Temperature contributes another part of the equation. An indoor flowerpot generally remains at the same moderate temperatures that make a home comfortable for people. Unlike outdoor soil, it may never freeze, experience prolonged drought, or undergo many of the environmental extremes found outdoors.
Humidity and airflow can matter as well.
And then there is pH.
Many common houseplants are grown in mildly acidic media. Fungi frequently tolerate acidic environments well, although acidity alone does not mean mold will grow. pH is simply another environmental variable interacting with moisture, available nutrients, temperature, aeration, and the organisms already present.
Put everything together and the question becomes easier to understand.
Moisture. Organic material. Nutrients. Comfortable temperatures. Sometimes elevated humidity. Sometimes acidic growing media. Sometimes intentionally introduced microorganisms.
A flowerpot can become its own small indoor ecosystem.
Not Every Houseplant Creates the Same Environment
This is where the type of plant becomes important.
Consider the difference between a cactus and a papyrus plant.
A cactus can be grown in a coarse, rapidly draining medium and allowed to become quite dry between waterings.
Papyrus naturally prefers extremely wet conditions.
A Boston fern generally prefers considerably more moisture than a snake plant. Maidenhair ferns are notoriously intolerant of drying. Many Calatheas prefer consistently moist growing media and elevated humidity.
These differences are why AuntieGen does not believe all houseplants should be viewed identically when evaluating the home of a highly mold-sensitive individual.
We looked at common indoor plants based on the environments generally required to maintain them, including their moisture requirements, typical growing media, drainage, water retention, humidity, organic content, and preferred pH.
From that review, we developed the following list.
AuntieGen’s 50 Higher-Concern Houseplants for Mold-Sensitive Homes
These are the 50 houseplants whose typical growing conditions we believe deserve the greatest scrutiny in the home of a highly mold-sensitive individual:
- Papyrus
- Umbrella Sedge / Umbrella Plant (Cyperus)
- Sarracenia Pitcher Plant
- Nepenthes Pitcher Plant
- Maidenhair Fern
- Boston Fern
- Bird’s Nest Fern
- Gardenia
- Prayer Plant / Calathea
- Rattlesnake Calathea
- Peacock Calathea
- Rose-Painted Calathea
- Velvet Calathea
- Fittonia / Nerve Plant
- Peace Lily
- Indoor / Florist Azalea
- African Violet
- Anthurium / Flamingo Flower
- Alocasia / Elephant Ear
- Piggyback Plant
- Friendship Plant / Pilea
- Aluminum Plant
- Asparagus Fern
- Areca Palm
- Parlor Palm
- Lady Palm
- Bamboo Palm
- Pygmy Date Palm
- Zebra Plant
- Coleus
- Hibiscus
- Begonia
- Gloxinia
- Calla Lily
- Croton
- Dieffenbachia / Dumb Cane
- Schefflera
- Fatsia / Japanese Aralia
- Norfolk Island Pine
- Monstera
- Philodendron
- Pothos / Devil’s Ivy
- Spider Plant
- Rubber Plant / Ficus elastica
- Weeping Fig / Ficus benjamina
- Chinese Evergreen / Aglaonema
- Dracaena / Corn Plant
- Ti Plant / Cordyline
- Tradescantia
- Bromeliads
This is an AuntieGen environmental screening list, not a published medical ranking of the 50 “moldiest” plants.
We are not claiming that every specimen of these plants contains problematic mold. We are also not saying that a plant absent from this list is automatically safe for every mold-sensitive person.
We are saying that these plants commonly require combinations of moisture, organic growing media, water retention, humidity, acidity, or other conditions that, in our opinion, warrant greater attention when someone is attempting to minimize potential fungal reservoirs inside the home.
How the plant is actually maintained can be even more important than its name.
What’s in the Bag?
The next question is one most people probably never ask.
What exactly is your houseplant growing in?
Modern “potting soil” frequently isn’t soil in the traditional sense at all. Commercial soilless growing media commonly contain combinations of sphagnum peat moss, bark, coconut coir, compost, perlite, vermiculite, and other ingredients. Manufacturers may also add fertilizer, lime, wetting agents, and moisture-retaining amendments.
That distinction matters.
Perlite, coarse sand, pumice, expanded clay, and similar inorganic materials are fundamentally different from compost, peat, bark, and other organic materials.
Vermiculite itself isn’t mold food either. Its relevance is primarily that it can retain water. Whether that becomes important depends on the entire growing mixture and how wet it is kept.
The goal should not be to label every potting ingredient as “bad.”
The goal is to understand what kind of environment the combination of ingredients creates.
And What Have You Added Since You Bought the Plant?
This may be even more important than what came in the original bag.
Indoor gardeners routinely modify their growing media.
Some additions increase organic material. Some introduce microorganisms. Some encourage microbial activity. Some retain water. Others introduce pesticides or other chemicals into the indoor environment.
For someone who is highly mold-sensitive, we believe the following materials deserve additional consideration:
Compost and compost tea; manure and composted manure; worm castings; mycorrhizal fungal inoculants; microbial soil inoculants and biostimulants; molasses, sugars, and other amendments intended to stimulate microbial activity; guano; blood meal; bone meal; feather meal; fish emulsion and other fish-based fertilizers; continuously wet sphagnum moss; heavy peat-based amendments; wood mulch and wood chips; heavily composted bark; water-retention crystals and hydrogels; wetting agents designed to increase or prolong water retention; and homemade organic soil amendments of unknown composition.
These materials do not all present the same concern.
Some primarily add organic material.
Some increase moisture retention.
Some encourage biological activity.
Some intentionally introduce fungi or bacteria.
And some do several of those things simultaneously.
Adding these materials to an otherwise lower-concern growing medium may change the indoor environment by increasing organic material, microbial activity, moisture retention, or some combination of the three.
What About the Chemically Sensitive Individual?
There is another group of people we need to consider separately.
Some individuals who are concerned about mold exposure are also particularly sensitive to chemical exposures.
For these individuals, what has been applied to the plant or its growing medium deserves its own evaluation.
Systemic insecticides, pesticide soil drenches, fungicides, herbicides, chemically formulated wetting agents, certain synthetic fertilizers, plant-growth regulators, rooting products, leaf-shine products, and other chemical treatments used on or around indoor plants may introduce an entirely different category of exposure.
These products are not interchangeable, and we should not suggest that every fertilizer or every plant treatment releases harmful amounts of chemicals into a home.
The chemistry, dose, application method, volatility, frequency of use, ventilation, and individual susceptibility all matter.
However, pesticides are intentionally biologically active chemicals, and some pesticides and other products can contribute volatile or semi-volatile compounds to the indoor environment.
For someone who already knows that particular chemical exposures are problematic for them, the product label and Safety Data Sheet may be just as important as the name of the plant.
There may therefore be two separate questions inside the same flowerpot.
What biological environment are we maintaining?
And what chemicals are we introducing into the home to maintain it?
Water May Be the Biggest Variable of All
We can research plants.
We can research potting media.
We can research pH.
We can examine fertilizers and amendments.
But there is one thing AuntieGen cannot predict or control:
How you water your plants.
Two people can own exactly the same plant in exactly the same potting mixture and create completely different environments.
One person may allow the growing medium to dry appropriately between waterings.
Another may water on a schedule regardless of whether the plant needs it.
Water may remain in the saucer beneath the plant. A decorative outer container may conceal standing water. Drainage holes may be blocked. Dead leaves may accumulate on the soil surface. The growing medium may remain damp continuously.
Visible fungal growth may develop.
Fungus gnats may appear.
The soil may develop an unusual musty odor.
Those observations matter.
A plant that would ordinarily present relatively little concern can become a very different environment when its growing medium remains chronically wet.
That is also why no list of 50 plants, or 100 plants, could ever account for every situation.
Does a Fungal Reservoir Automatically Mean an Airborne Exposure?
No.
This is an important limitation in the evidence.
Demonstrating fungi in potting soil does not automatically demonstrate that those fungi are entering the breathing zone at a meaningful concentration, nor does it establish that a particular flowerpot is causing someone’s symptoms.
The CDC itself makes an important distinction. It does not recommend removing flowers and potted plants from areas occupied by immunocompetent patients, while it does recommend excluding them from areas occupied by immunosuppressed patients.
So the science does not support telling every person in every home that houseplants are dangerous.
What the evidence does establish is that potting media can contain fungi, including fungi of potential medical importance, and that highly susceptible populations warrant greater precautions.
For mold-sensitive individuals who are neither severely immunocompromised nor part of the general unaffected population, the importance of a particular flowerpot has to be considered in context.
That is precisely why we believe the subject deserves more attention rather than less.
Should You Move Your Houseplants Outside?
For someone who is highly mold-sensitive and actively attempting to reduce potential fungal reservoirs inside the home, this may be the simplest option to consider.
Move the plants outside of the conditioned living environment when climate and plant requirements make that practical.
That does not mean every one of those plants was contaminated.
It does not mean the plants caused anyone’s symptoms.
It simply removes the flowerpots and their damp growing media from the indoor environment.
For some people, modifying the growing medium, improving drainage, reducing overwatering, eliminating standing water, avoiding unnecessary organic amendments, or choosing drought-tolerant plants may be reasonable alternatives.
Cacti, many succulents, jade plants, aloe, ponytail palms, ZZ plants, snake plants, and other drought-tolerant species grown in rapidly draining media and allowed to dry substantially between watering generally create a very different growing environment from the moisture-loving plants at the top of our list.
But if someone is extraordinarily sensitive and is attempting to reduce potential fungal reservoirs as far as reasonably practical, there is an obvious question worth asking:
Do the plants need to be inside the house at all?
For someone who lives where winter temperatures make year-round outdoor growing impossible, the answer may require a more difficult decision. A plant collection may have tremendous personal value. The purpose of this discussion is not to make that decision for anyone.
It is to make sure the decision is informed.
So Are Houseplants Bad?
That is probably the wrong question.
Houseplants aren’t inherently bad.
Fungi aren’t inherently bad either. They are an enormous and necessary part of the natural environment. Mycorrhizal fungi, for example, can be extraordinarily beneficial to plants.
The question changes when we bring that ecosystem indoors and place it next to someone who is particularly sensitive to fungal exposure.
For most healthy people, the presence of houseplants is unlikely to justify alarm simply because fungi can exist in their potting soil.
For someone who is highly mold-sensitive, however, we believe flowerpots deserve much closer scrutiny.
And for someone who is significantly immunocompromised, this becomes a medical issue. The CDC specifically recommends excluding potted plants and flowers from certain environments occupied by immunosuppressed patients. Decisions for an individual patient should be made with the healthcare practitioner who understands that person’s medical condition.
Our list of 50 plants is therefore not an accusation against houseplants.
It is a practical environmental guide.
There will be plants outside this list that develop fungal growth. There will undoubtedly be plants on the list that never develop a significant fungal problem. Growing medium, watering habits, drainage, humidity, amendments, plant health, environmental conditions, and individual sensitivity can completely change the picture.
AuntieGen cannot control how often someone waters a plant or whether the growing medium is allowed to dry appropriately between waterings.
But we can ask people to look at something that is very easy to overlook.
If you are mold-sensitive and love houseplants, look beyond the leaves.
Look at the soil.
Look underneath the pot.
Look for standing water.
Look at what you have added to the growing medium.
Look at the products you use to fertilize it and control insects or disease.
Think about how long that growing medium remains wet.
And consider whether moving some, or even all, of your plants outside your living environment makes sense for you.
You don’t have to stop loving plants.
But if you are trying to understand and reduce potential fungal exposure inside your home, you should understand the environment you are maintaining inside every flowerpot.
AuntieGen
Protection From What You Can’t See.
Recent Comments